FlickrFacebookRSS Feed

Response to a letter…

Posted on Monday, January 25, 2010 in Opinion, Political campaign

Just finished your book, interesting. Not an Oregon voter (MI) but noted and have to hope you rethink this one (Public Employees Take Notice, Jan 8 blog). Being the child of UAW workers, and now a unionized college professor – I can honestly say there is waste in the system. And it is unfortunate to have votes sold to interest groups. But there is waste in every system, and there is corruption on all sides. I am all for improving/streamlining/increasing accountability (I LOVE (and benefit) from our merit based raises for instance) – but targeting this (large) group as bogeymen seems out of proportion to the problem(s). Phil Renato

Dear Phil,

Glad you enjoyed my book. My kids nagged me into writing it.

I’m not picking on public employee unions any more than I am the lawyer’s union, doctor’s union or indeed, this union of 50 states. All unions by nature exclude non-members from consideration; all are corrupted by selfish-interest. Only individuals have ethics. Groups don’t. These “groups” pool their money to buy laws favoring themselves at the expense of non-members.

Only by public financing of elections and outlawing “contributions” to elected officials can we have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. What we have now is government for sale to the highest bidder. Public employee unions are the highest bidders of all as witnessed by the wide gap over the private sector in pay scale (45% higher) and benefits (70% higher). Public employees should have never been allowed to unionize. Neither should anyone else for that matter. The argument that employers tread on employees is spurious; all are free to seek the best wages anyplace they can be found and can quit without notice to do so. This is “free-enterprise.” All unions extort so should be banned for the same reason we outlawed the communist party.

Bookmark and Share

Bring on the comments

  1. Howie says:

    The communist party should have never been banned. Who is “we”?

  2. Jerry says:

    Well, I didn’t vote to ban commies but my representatives did, or I should say my parent’s representatives. Seems unconstitutional to me. I wasn’t old enough to vote then. Guess that’s what I meant by “we.”

  3. Ski Daddy says:

    There may be a place out there somewhere for ‘organized’ crime. Coal miners for one still need protection against unscrupulous owners. And the teamsters, shucks man, sho nuff needs a union to give ‘em those long buckboard wagons with a team of 16 horses with more chrome on them than a Harley… to haul the Co-op’s corn to the railway station so the big shots can grind it up and make corn syrup and poison our food with it.

    Think what a different world it would be if Henry Ford was around to conduct national seminars on “How to Bust a Union” …
    It all makes perfect sense to call a spade
    a spade.

  4. LLL3 says:

    Henry Ford gave workers the 8 hour day, not the unions. In order to sell his cars he needed to give people leisure time to drive around in them. He needed consumers.

Leave a Reply